Nutritionpreliminary · human data

Watermelon may cut blood pressure — and nudge blood sugar up

A meta-analysis of 9 randomised controlled trials found watermelon consumption significantly lowered systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol — but also significantly raised fasting blood sugar.

Compiled by FitTools from the study cited below

The citation, figures and study details on this page are taken mechanically from the source record. No human editor has reviewed it.

Added to Pulse 8 August 2026

Study design
Meta-analysis
Evidence
preliminary
Published
8 August 2026

Key takeaway

What it shows: Meta-analysis of only 9 small RCTs; the authors describe the blood-pressure result as promising but explicitly call for longer, larger trials and urge caution on every outcome beyond blood pressure.

Study details

Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Karimi E, Abaj F, Gholizadeh M, Asbaghi O, Amini MR, Ghaedi E, et al.
Journal
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
Published
2023
Added to Pulse
8 August 2026

Why it matters

Fruit-based approaches to heart health attract plenty of claims but relatively little pooled trial evidence, and watermelon is a good example. It has been studied for effects on blood pressure, cholesterol and other cardiovascular risk factors in a scatter of small randomised trials, with no clear consensus emerging. Cardiovascular risk factors such as systolic blood pressure and LDL cholesterol are among the most consequential numbers in preventive health. This meta-analysis set out to establish what the randomised evidence, taken together, actually says about watermelon and these markers.

What they did

The authors searched the Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus up to March 2022 for randomised controlled trials of watermelon supplementation. From 8962 identified studies, 9 RCTs qualified for the final analysis. A random-effects model computed weighted mean differences across a wide panel of outcomes — blood pressure, heart rate, lipids, fasting blood sugar, insulin, BMI, body fat, arginine and the inflammatory marker CRP — with standard methods applied to examine publication bias, sensitivity and heterogeneity.

What they found

Watermelon consumption significantly decreased systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol across the pooled trials. Less conveniently, it also led to a significant increase in fasting blood sugar. A long list of other outcomes did not change significantly: diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, BMI, body fat, and serum levels of arginine, insulin and CRP were all unmoved. The authors describe the blood-pressure finding as promising evidence of an antihypertensive effect, while explicitly urging caution on the remaining outcomes given the thinness of the human evidence.

Where it fits

This is a rare attempt to pool the randomised watermelon literature, and it lands with a genuinely mixed verdict: favourable movement in blood pressure and two lipid measures, an unfavourable shift in fasting glucose, and mostly null results elsewhere. That blend complicates any simple 'watermelon is heart-healthy' message. The authors call for further RCTs with longer follow-ups and larger sample sizes before firm conclusions are drawn, and the fasting blood sugar signal in particular deserves clarification in future work.

What it means for you

For anyone interested in food-first ways of supporting cardiovascular health, this analysis offers a cautiously encouraging signal for watermelon on systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and LDL. The accompanying rise in fasting blood sugar is worth knowing about, particularly for readers who watch their glucose numbers. Neither finding is definitive: only 9 trials contributed, and the authors themselves flag the results as needing confirmation. This is a reason to see watermelon's cardiovascular story as promising but unfinished, not settled.

The source

Watermelon consumption decreases risk factors of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2023

DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110801

Read the study →

Related tools & guides

More research, with the reality check: every study we hold → · this week’s → · or open the full Pulse feed →