Ask the evidence

What does the evidence actually say?

Every line on this page comes from a study someone here has read. None of it knows anything about you.

What we hold on intermittent, fasting, weight and loss

Read as:intermittentfastingweightloss

9 vetted claims match all four terms. Strongest evidence first.

  1. Metabolic & GLP-1well supported · human data

    Pooled data from randomised trials show intermittent fasting reduced body weight by 1.78 kg, fat mass by 1.26 kg and waist circumference by 1.19 cm versus control diets, with small improvements in blood pressure, fasting insulin, insulin resistance, total cholesterol and triglycerides. LDL, HDL and long-term blood sugar did not change.

    What it shows: Believable but modest: results pooled from randomised trials up to October 2020 show small, consistent improvements across weight, waist, blood pressure and blood fats. The authors themselves say longer and better designed trials are needed before firm conclusions.Systematic review · Front Nutr

  2. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    Pooled results from 11 randomised trials lasting 8 to 24 weeks found intermittent energy restriction, including 5:2 regimens, produced essentially the same weight loss as continuous everyday dieting, with only a slight extra drop in fasting insulin of uncertain clinical relevance.

    What it shows: A trustworthy null: results pooled from 11 trials where people were assigned at random to fasting-style or standard calorie cutting, and weight loss came out the same. All the trials ran 24 weeks or less, so longer-term differences remain untested.Meta-analysis · J Transl Med

  3. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    Pooling nine randomised trials in 540 people with obesity, intermittent fasting produced no greater reduction in body weight or BMI than conventional control diets at any time point, and no difference emerged between alternate day fasting and time restricted eating.

    What it shows: Reasonably solid on the headline point: results pooled from nine trials lasting longer than two months in 540 people with a BMI above 30, though the authors rated the quality of evidence low to moderate. Data on mood and well-being were too thin to pool at all.Meta-analysis · Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis

  4. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    A meta-analysis of nine randomised trials in 899 Chinese adults found intermittent fasting reduced body weight, body fat, insulin resistance, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides compared with control groups, while waist circumference, fasting glucose and blood pressure did not change significantly.

    What it shows: Reasonably solid for the short term: results pooled from nine trials in 899 Chinese adults agree on weight and body fat, but the trials were brief and mostly tested time-restricted eating, so long-term effects and other fasting styles remain open questions.Meta-analysis · Nutrients

  5. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    Across 18 randomised trials in adults with overweight or obesity, intermittent fasting reduced weight, BMI, fat mass, waist circumference, daily energy intake and diastolic blood pressure compared with unrestricted eating, yet it did not improve sleep quality.

    What it shows: Solid on the weight and blood pressure findings: results pooled from 18 trials comparing fasting schedules with unrestricted eating in adults with overweight or obesity. Sleep was only a secondary measure in most of the studies, so trials built to test sleep directly are still needed.Meta-analysis · Sleep Med Rev

  6. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    Across 167 trials with 11,998 adults, intermittent fasting patterns produced weight loss comparable to ordinary calorie restriction of the same size, and fasting regimens showed weight rebound after 12 weeks while continuous restriction did not. What mattered was the depth of the energy cut, not the meal timing.

    What it shows: Strong evidence: results pooled from 167 trials in 11,998 adults with overweight, obesity or metabolic problems. Certainty ranged from low to high across the comparisons, and the rebound finding comes from a subgroup analysis, so it is the least firm piece.Meta-analysis · Nutr Rev

  7. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    Fasting for 14 hours a day may be as effective as 16 hours for weight loss, according to a sweep of 24 randomised trials of time-restricted feeding. The pattern produced moderate weight loss in people with overweight or obesity, and losses exceeded 5% of starting body weight when combined with calorie restriction.

    What it shows: Encouraging but not settled: a sweep of 24 trials found consistent short-term benefits in people carrying extra weight, but the trials were mostly brief and the authors themselves call for longer, better designed studies.Systematic review · Nutrients

  8. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    Over six months or longer, intermittent fasting reduced body weight by 2.84 kg, fat mass by 3.06 kg and waist circumference by 3.85 cm versus a control diet in adults with overweight or obesity; against continuous calorie restriction its edge shrank to 0.70 kg more fat lost.

    What it shows: Strong for a diet question: results pooled from 24 trials of 2032 adults with overweight or obesity, all lasting six months or more. The edge over ordinary calorie cutting was real but small, so neither approach clearly wins.Meta-analysis · Obes Rev

  9. Metabolic & GLP-1well supported · human data

    In adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes, intermittent fasting cut body weight by 4.56 kg and lowered HbA1c, fasting glucose, cholesterol and triglycerides versus control diets, but against straightforward calorie restriction it added only modest extra weight loss and no metabolic advantage.

    What it shows: Meta-analysis of 14 randomised trials (1,101 adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes); fat mass, insulin, LDL, HDL and blood pressure did not improve versus control, and versus calorie restriction there were no differences in glycaemic markers, lipids or blood pressure.Meta-analysis · Diabetes Obes Metab

Related, not an answer to your question

  1. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    A network meta-analysis of 92 trials in adults aged 55-70 with overweight or obesity found that combining calorie restriction with resistance or mixed exercise and high protein intake was the most effective strategy for nearly all body-composition outcomes. Energy restriction alone was less effective and tended to decrease muscle mass.

    What it shows: Network meta-analysis of RCTs: 92 studies included, 66 of them (4,957 participants) usable for pooling; interventions lasted only 8 weeks to 6 months, and network comparisons are partly indirect.Meta-analysis · Adv Nutr

Not what you meant? Try different words: this box matches terms, not meaning, so creatine hair finds different things from creatine hair loss.