Ask the evidence

What does the evidence actually say?

Every line on this page comes from a study someone here has read. None of it knows anything about you.

What we hold on resistance, training, older and adult

Read as:resistancetrainingolderadult

9 vetted claims match all four terms. Strongest evidence first.

  1. Trainingwell supported · human data

    Power training, lifting with fast, high-velocity movement, showed a small advantage over conventional slow-velocity resistance training for functional outcomes in over-60s, in a meta-analysis of 11 trials with 377 participants (pooled effect size 0.32).

    What it shows: Meta-analysis of 11 small trials (377 community-dwelling people over 60); the pooled advantage was small, several confidence intervals crossed zero, and no firm conclusion could be made on safety.Meta-analysis · Age Ageing

    Full breakdown →Sarcopenia explained →
    Source: Is power training or conventional resistance training better for function in elderly persons? A meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2011
  2. Trainingwell supported · human data

    In older adults, muscle size gained through resistance training declines again once training stops, a meta-analysis found (Cohen's d -0.83 after cessation); losses were significant after 31-52 weeks of detraining but not after 12-24 weeks.

    What it shows: Meta-analysis of only 6 studies (8 groups) in older adults, with detraining windows ranging from 12 to 52 weeks; the exact time course of muscle loss remains unestablished.Meta-analysis · Int J Environ Res Public Health

    Full breakdown →Sarcopenia explained →
    Source: Use It or Lose It? A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Resistance Training Cessation (Detraining) on Muscle Size in Older Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022
  3. Supplementswell supported · human data

    In a meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials (459 older adults with sarcopenia), adding branched-chain amino acid-rich supplements to resistance training improved only skeletal muscle index (SMD 0.337, p = 0.029). Grip strength, walking speed, chair-stand performance, SPPB score, knee extension strength, total lean mass and fat mass showed no significant advantage.

    What it shows: Meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials with only 459 participants in total, all older adults with sarcopenia; the one positive outcome had a confidence interval reaching close to zero and several functional measures pointed in inconsistent directions, so this cannot be read across to younger or healthy trainees.Meta-analysis · Arch Gerontol Geriatr

    Full breakdown →Sarcopenia explained →Protein Intake Calculator →
    Source: Effects of branched-chain amino acid-rich nutritional supplements combined with resistance training on body composition and body function in older patients with sarcopenia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2026
  4. Metabolic & GLP-1well supported · human data

    A network meta-analysis of 29 randomised trials in 1,301 middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes found high-intensity resistance training produced the largest HbA1c reduction versus usual care (MD -0.62), ranking top of 10 exercise interventions, while moderate-intensity resistance training led on fasting glucose and high-intensity aerobic training drove the biggest gains in peak oxygen uptake. No intervention significantly reduced resting heart rate.

    What it shows: Network meta-analysis of 29 RCTs and 1,301 participants with type 2 diabetes; only the HbA1c result for high-intensity resistance training reached moderate certainty, the fasting glucose and blood pressure networks were rated low or very low, and the VO2peak network was sparse and described as exploratory.Meta-analysis · Front Public Health

    Full breakdown →Insulin sensitivity explained →Metabolic Fitness Index →
    Source: Comparative effects of different intensities of aerobic and resistance exercise on glycemic control and cardiorespiratory fitness in middle-aged older patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis. Front Public Health 2026
  5. Supplementswell supported · human data

    Across 13 randomised trials of 561 adults aged 50 and over, adding HMB to resistance training produced no significant benefit for fat mass (SMD 0.24), muscle mass (SMD 0.05) or muscle strength (SMD 0.04). The authors concluded it cannot be recommended as a routine adjunct for people able to do structured exercise.

    What it shows: Meta-analysis of 13 randomised trials totalling 561 adults aged 50 and over; heterogeneity was high for the strength outcomes and trial durations and doses varied, and the findings say nothing about people unable to train or about younger lifters.Meta-analysis · Age Ageing

    Full breakdown →Sarcopenia explained →Protein Intake Calculator →
    Source: Efficacy of HMB supplementation as an adjunct to resistance training in older adults: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2026
  6. Nutritionwell supported · human data

    In a network meta-analysis of 235 randomised trials covering 20,980 untrained older adults, whey protein plus resistance training ranked as the most effective combination for muscle mass (SMD 1.29) and leg strength (SMD 1.16), while whey plus multicomponent training ranked highest for mobility tasks.

    What it shows: Network meta-analysis of 235 RCTs in untrained older adults, so most rankings rest on indirect comparisons; certainty was moderate for muscle mass and leg strength, effects were moderated by participant condition and protein dose, and findings may not transfer to already-trained people.Meta-analysis · Nutrients

    Full breakdown →Sarcopenia explained →Protein Intake Calculator →
    Source: Explore the Optimal Treatment Regimen Across Combinations of Variate Protein Sources and Exercise Modalities and Its Associated Factors in Older Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2026
  7. Trainingwell supported · human data

    A meta-analysis of 33 randomised trials in 1,396 middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes found resistance training reduced the atherogenic index of plasma (effect size -0.56) and improved glycaemic control, lowering HbA1c by 0.62% and HOMA-IR by 0.90. Systolic blood pressure fell by 3.91 mmHg and body fat by 0.54%, while VO2max rose, with stronger effects in overweight or obese participants.

    What it shows: Meta-analysis of 33 randomised trials with a modest combined sample (n = 1,396) of middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes; heterogeneity was substantial across several outcomes, methodological quality varied, and the included studies were geographically concentrated, so pooled effect sizes are indicative rather than precise.Meta-analysis · Maturitas

    Full breakdown →Insulin sensitivity explained →Metabolic Fitness Index →
    Source: The impact of resistance training on the Atherogenic index of plasma and cardiometabolic health-related indicators in middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Maturitas 2026
  8. Trainingwell supported · human data

    Pooling five randomised trials in older adults (74 doing photobiomodulation plus resistance training, 72 doing sham), adding light therapy to periodised lifting did not significantly improve maximal strength (SMD 0.26, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.59; p = 0.14). A small benefit could not be ruled out.

    What it shows: Systematic review of 11 RCTs (n = 456), but only five trials with 146 participants in total reported one-repetition maximum and were pooled; devices, wavelengths and dosing varied, and the authors say a small effect cannot be excluded.Meta-analysis · Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg

    Full breakdown →Strength explained →One-Rep Max Calculator →
    Source: Photobiomodulation as an Adjunct to Resistance Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg 2026
  9. Mindwell supported · human data

    Combined aerobic and resistance training improved global cognition in healthy adults aged 65 and over compared with doing nothing, but a meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials found it was no better than active comparison conditions.

    What it shows: Meta-analysis of 12 RCTs (2557 healthy adults aged 65+); the overall pooled effect was non-significant, benefit appeared only against passive controls, and heterogeneity was moderate.Meta-analysis · Exp Gerontol

    Full breakdown →Meta-analysis explained →
    Source: The regular effects of concurrent aerobic and resistance exercise on global cognition in healthy elderly populations: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials. Exp Gerontol 2025

Related, not an answer to your question

  1. Trainingwell supported · human data

    A network meta-analysis of 39 randomised trials in 2,585 overweight or obese university students found combined aerobic-plus-resistance training most effective for improving BMI, body weight and fat mass, while HIIT produced the biggest reduction in body fat percentage.

    What it shows: Network meta-analysis of 39 RCTs restricted to overweight and obese university students; searches relied on a single database platform, and findings may not generalise to other age groups or settings.Meta-analysis · PeerJ

    Full breakdown →HIIT explained →Body Fat Calculator →
    Source: Efficacy of four exercise modalities on body composition in overweight and obese university students: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PeerJ 2026

Not what you meant? Try different words: this box matches terms, not meaning, so creatine hair finds different things from creatine hair loss.